Having an equal playing field avoids controversy but
if it is not managed right it can go south.
People need to work hard and get
educated themselves to support their own weight. As
well as government shouldn't have their foot in every door. More over helping people that can’t afford a
hospital bill; not set their whole future up.
According to the article the Herald, “If people are left to
decide for themselves what they are capable of doing, life would be more predictable.” Meaning that it would be so complicated, if
someone couldn't afford something they couldn't get it. But with government involved now all the
sudden they can afford it. That can be
taken even further to the next level which would be socialism. According to wikipedia, Socialism is an
economic system characterized by social ownership of means of production. That’s what it is going to come down to,
whether or not everything is going to be free to everyone.
Health care is already socialist. If you go to the emergency room, they pick up the tab and pass it on to everyone else's premium. Since 98% of people will go to the hospital at one point in their lives, doesn't it make sense to give everyone at least basic coverage so we can manage the system instead of passing the free rider's bill on to your insurance plan?
ReplyDeleteBill O'Riley is a terrible role model